Sunday, April 9, 2017

A leading British Counter-Controller to the Applied Behavioral Analysis Controllers believes she can defeat them by arguing science. This approach is doomed to fail. The public ought to know.

The leading British Counter-Controller to the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Controllers believes she can defeat ABA by arguing science. This approach is doomed to fail.

ABA does manipulate behaviors scientifically, though it does so in a highly-unethical manner. ABA Leaks says ABA is pseudoscience, not because it cannot control behaviors with their techniques, but because they ignore critical data about them, the fact that ABA causes Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Some people eat sushi again because it reinforced them when they had it before. If it had made them puke, they would avoid it. Period. It's as simple as that. Consequences to action affect behavior. We can say they "control" behaviors in the future, or we can say "influence." We cannot deny the sun. We cannot deny this discovery by B. F. Skinner, the hypocrite who opposed punishment for so-called "normal" people, but not for autistics and others with disabilities.

Just because nuclear energy is real, that does not mean we should drop the A-Bomb. Just because operant conditioning by way of consequences added and removed after we emit responses does indeed influence our behavior rates, that does not mean we should do it. ABA does not get this ethics. They live a behavior control and coercion world even causes them their own miserable divorces and the punishment of their own now-silenced dissenters from deep within their ranks. This is why we call it a cult.

When this primary UK CounterController calls the operant conditioning phenomenon "rubbish," well there's no point in moving forward together, the UK team as it stands now and ABA Leaks. That's like calling a rainbow "rubbish."

This UK CounterController, to the detriment of the UK autistics, does not understand ABA method well at all. As she proceeds to tell British officials that ABA is bad science, ABA will argue scientific circles around her. This is sad.

We wish them luck over there across that Atlantic, and wisdom. ABA Leaks feels that the public autism community ought to know this.

Related post

Altieri (April 9, 2017): The Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience said, "The time has come to stop forcing ABA on the autistic child."

No comments :

Post a Comment

Copyright and disclaimers

Reward and Consent , © is January 15, 2007 to the current date. All rights reserved (and stuff like that). E-mail me for permission to reproduce in part or in full. Please link to and cite passages quoted or paraphrased from here.

Reward and Con
sent is not responsible for links on the site. For example, I use keywords "Operant Conditioning" in the YouTube search field for the videos displayed below the archives on the left. Google selects the videos and the results change from time to time. Please email me if anything is not educational and germane to the subject and I will reevaluate the search.

I am an advocate for people with disabilities certified to teach special education with a Master of Arts in Teaching. I am not a Licensed Psychologist or a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. When in doubt, seek the advice of an MD, a PhD, or a BCBA. My ability to analyze the ethics of ABA stems from the fact that I am disabled and ABA interventions are often done to people like me, which I voluntarily accept, but only when I alone am the person granting consent, and not a parent, sibling, guardian, or institution.